both flesh forwards from present to past and you don't know who which guy is the one from future.
both about friendship and love triangle, but more friendship (in both),
in both drama one of ML is introvert, kind of awkward but nice guy.
in both drama family, friendship relationships are shown very beautifully (of course one is long and other short drama but both do great job in the time they have).
in both there are smiles and tiers too.
even some scenes reminded me Reply 88
P.S. it's hard to say about any drama that it is similar and equally good as Reply 1988 but this short drama was really very close
both about friendship and love triangle, but more friendship (in both),
in both drama one of ML is introvert, kind of awkward but nice guy.
in both drama family, friendship relationships are shown very beautifully (of course one is long and other short drama but both do great job in the time they have).
in both there are smiles and tiers too.
even some scenes reminded me Reply 88
P.S. it's hard to say about any drama that it is similar and equally good as Reply 1988 but this short drama was really very close
Both dramas focus on each character's individual lives, portraying their struggles and emotions beautifully. In the way in which the characters of Reply 1988 live together, rely on each other and cry together; the characters of our blues reside on Jeju island and their various occupations are intertwined. I'll go as far as to say the occupations depend on each other.
Both dramas:
- tell stories of neighbours, in reply they know each other since kids and in the other are couples who live in the same building
- are hilarious
- have cute romance
- have the same vibe
- that dialogs owo
- every character is important and have its own story
(bonus: in the lover you have bl)
- tell stories of neighbours, in reply they know each other since kids and in the other are couples who live in the same building
- are hilarious
- have cute romance
- have the same vibe
- that dialogs owo
- every character is important and have its own story
(bonus: in the lover you have bl)
I know one is a drama and the other is a reality dating show, but I'm mainly recommending because they both give that warm feeling of familial love.
Reply 1988 is a story of 4 families and their struggles/joys, with romance weaving in between. My Sibling's Romance is a dating show where 4 sets of siblings live together and go on dates with others without revealing who their sibling is.
Reply 1988 gave me a feeling of warmth that I have rarely felt while watching something. But My Sibling's Romance made me feel that same way, through the bond each sibling duo has. The dynamics differ but they are all equally precious. It's nice seeing the siblings root for each other and look out for each other in a setting where they don't know anyone else but each other. The backstories of each family will either leave you sobbing or with a massive grin.
Truly the best way I can describe it is that both are about family and love, and give you this big warm hug as you watch.
Reply 1988 is a story of 4 families and their struggles/joys, with romance weaving in between. My Sibling's Romance is a dating show where 4 sets of siblings live together and go on dates with others without revealing who their sibling is.
Reply 1988 gave me a feeling of warmth that I have rarely felt while watching something. But My Sibling's Romance made me feel that same way, through the bond each sibling duo has. The dynamics differ but they are all equally precious. It's nice seeing the siblings root for each other and look out for each other in a setting where they don't know anyone else but each other. The backstories of each family will either leave you sobbing or with a massive grin.
Truly the best way I can describe it is that both are about family and love, and give you this big warm hug as you watch.
Okay, this might seem like the weirdest and inept recommendation you have ever seen. But let me explain:
While I was watching Reply 1988, I would be repeatedly reminded of Nirvana in Fire. At first glance, these two dramas have nothing in common. One is a Korean drama set in 1988 about family and friendship in a tiny social universe. The other is a historical, highly strategic drama set in China at the emperor's court.
However, they are similar in more subtle matters:
Both plots work only because of the tight networks they are set in, in one it is a neighbourhood street, in the other the aristocratic court. What in Reply 1988 is build on social ties, is build upon a political net in NiF.
Then there is the universal and well-rounded plot that involves most humane emotions and ambitions on which the story is build on. This is what makes them similar: There are no big "events" or accidents or villains out-of-the-blue that lead the story, but the people's emotions, ambitions and motifs ARE the story.
Both do not emphasize on the romance, although it is there. And both are written, shot and acted superbly.
You know, it is kind of comparing an absolutely fantastic cheese to an absolutely fantastic cheese-cake. They seem nothing alike, but when you look closer, or taste deliberately, you will "feel" that both were made from the same kind of milk. :)
While I was watching Reply 1988, I would be repeatedly reminded of Nirvana in Fire. At first glance, these two dramas have nothing in common. One is a Korean drama set in 1988 about family and friendship in a tiny social universe. The other is a historical, highly strategic drama set in China at the emperor's court.
However, they are similar in more subtle matters:
Both plots work only because of the tight networks they are set in, in one it is a neighbourhood street, in the other the aristocratic court. What in Reply 1988 is build on social ties, is build upon a political net in NiF.
Then there is the universal and well-rounded plot that involves most humane emotions and ambitions on which the story is build on. This is what makes them similar: There are no big "events" or accidents or villains out-of-the-blue that lead the story, but the people's emotions, ambitions and motifs ARE the story.
Both do not emphasize on the romance, although it is there. And both are written, shot and acted superbly.
You know, it is kind of comparing an absolutely fantastic cheese to an absolutely fantastic cheese-cake. They seem nothing alike, but when you look closer, or taste deliberately, you will "feel" that both were made from the same kind of milk. :)